>>1853I've listened to this a couple of times (you're welcome for the 40+ views) trying to figure out what to say, but everything that I consider mentioning might just be a quirk/feature of the genre. As I'm not familiar enough with it and would rather not pollute the mind of a composer with outsider noise, I'll say instead that "Submerged" was the tune I enjoyed the most.
>>1862>my microphone is actually pretty good, its just that i sometimes even degrade the vocalsI see, then maybe it's just the way you go about degrading them. If the vocals were ripped jeans, yours would be the overused worn rather than the ripped in production type. People can find charm in the former but they'll believe it's bad wardrobe day rather than a statement more often than not (you can argue that's a statement in and of itself).
>all of those tracks (expect second part of eternal) were improvised and just me wallowing in sadness, so i try to keep the intimacy to match what it felt to me, in a wayThat comes across nicely, in an "intriguing, let's listen" way and not in a "oh MAN this guy's whining AGAIN?" way. That takes some level of ability.
>>1863>Nope, it's just a very chill version of Seiji Igusa's "Keey the Groovy".Post too long. Click here to view the full text. 
